Re: [ga-rules] call to the order

["Patrick Corliss" <patrick@quad.net.au>]

On Mon, 09 Jul 2001 23:50:49 +0200, Jefsey Morfin wrote:

> I think that at this stage I should call to the order:
>
<snip>
>
> for sabotaging the sub-list process and porting to the GA a matter of
> obvious interest only to the ga-rules. I therefore bring it back to the
> ga-rules list where it belongs before the daily posting number of some
> become outrageous to the GA tranquility

Very funny, Jefsey.

> Actually this is not a joke. I happen to think

That's your personal opinion.  But it has no legitimacy with the DNSO
Secretariat or within the GA generally.  You can change that by generating
support for your ideas.

> that the sub-list system, as
> articially used and maintained by some, is only a way to kill the GA. So
it
> is IMO legitimate to send that go-to-no-where discussion to such a
> go-to-no-where sub-list.

I am strongly in favour of your suggestion that all mail should appear on
[ga-full].  This is a simple matter to arrange.  All we need to do is
subscribe {ga-full] to all of the sublists.  It would create a set of
*virtual* constituencies which I suggested when I stood for election as
Alternate Chair.

What you don't appreciate is how hard such a thing is to arrange.  It is a
Catch-22 situation.  The DNSO Secretariat will not accept any request for
changes without GA consensus and we cannot get consensus with so many people
deliberately wrecking the system.

> Pease, enjoy now. You are at the proper place. Still 5 posts today to go!
> Jefsey

Best regards
Patrick Corliss







--
This message was passed to you via the ga-rules@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-rules" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html