Re: Re[4]: [ga-sys] The EU Privacy issue

["NameCritic" <watch-dog@inreach.com>]

Amazing how all things that disagree with your posts are devoid of facts.
You stated the DNSO does not exist legally. Define away William. Because I
like where this is going. If they do not exist legally then the
Constituencie that now exist within the DNSO have no power to vote on
anything and also exist illegally. That poses a very interesting argument. I
wish to hear more. The vague references you give as responses to everyone
here are simply not enough William.

Agreeing to arbitration makes the UDRP a law in effect. It is an
administrative panel that presides but since it is required it has to be
treated as law for the purposes of this discussion. If you state that TM
Holders have no right by law to the domain names they have been given this
too raises a very interesting point of view that I wish to have you
elaborate on oh knowledgeable one.

That smart alec remark is improper but directly related to yours to me. I
suggest we both refrain from their use, but in a battle of wits I assure you
William you are totally unprepared. So that said, I'll apologize and take
back calling you knowledgeable.


Chris McElroy aka NameCritic

----- Original Message -----
From: "William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>
To: "NameCritic" <watch-dog@inreach.com>
Cc: <ga-sys@dnso.org>
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 3:03 AM
Subject: Re[4]: [ga-sys] The EU Privacy issue


> Hello NameCritic,
>
> Friday, May 25, 2001, 2:53:03 AM, NameCritic wrote:
> >> You have a case in court for stopping someone from utilizing your
> >> trademark unlawfully.  But that doesn't mean you have a right to the
> >> domain name itself.  NO law gives you a right to the domain name,
> >> merely to protection to prevent others from using your trademark in an
> >> infringing manner.
> >>
>
> > Then why does the UDRP award the domain name to the Complainant? The
cases
> > don't end with You can't use this domain name anymore. They end with the
> > transfer of the domain name to the TM Holder. Where ya been Will?
>
> The UDRP is NOT the law.
>
> >> MS's conditions are vastly different. The DNSO does not have to
> >> negotiate with the EU.  The DNSO does not exist legally, and does not
> >> enter into any contracts as far as that goes.
>
> > So the DNSO is illegal? Where do you get this wonderful information you
post
> > as fact?
>
> There is a difference between not existing as a legal entity and being
> illegal.
>
> Would you like a link to some definitions of the two terms?
>
> As with your other post on alt-roots, you are devoid of facts.
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> William X Walsh
> mailto:william@userfriendly.com
> Owner, Userfriendly.com
> Userfriendly.com Domains
> The most advanced domain lookup tool on the net
>
>

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-sys@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-sys" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html