[ga-udrp] Re: [ga-tm] Motion #6: UDRP review
At 23:03 20/05/01 -0700, NameCritic wrote:
>
>Also three years is a long time on the Internet. I support what
you are
>trying to do, but isn't two years sufficient and it should be
that the
>Registrant info hasn't changed instead of the admin contact.
Things change
>at a company and what if the admin contact moves to another job
and is
>removed from the contact in whois. Same Registrant still,
different admin.
>It happens. If it is transferred within two years to another
Registrant
>however it seems the period would start over for that domain
name.
>
I feel the same way, Milton. Consider two years held by an unchanged
registrant.
--Joop-- Founder of the Cyberspace Association. Former bootstrap of the IDNO (www.idno.org) Developer of The Polling Booth www.democracy.org.nz/vote1/
|