ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-udrp]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[ga-udrp] Re: [ga-tm] Motion #6: UDRP review


At 23:03 20/05/01 -0700, NameCritic wrote:

>
>Also three years is a long time on the Internet. I support what you are
>trying to do, but isn't two years sufficient and it should be that the
>Registrant info hasn't changed instead of the admin contact. Things change
>at a company and what if the admin contact moves to another job and is
>removed from the contact in whois. Same Registrant still, different admin.
>It happens. If it is transferred within two years to another Registrant
>however it seems the period would start over for that domain name.
>

I feel the same way, Milton. Consider two years held by an unchanged registrant.

--Joop--
Founder of the Cyberspace Association.
Former bootstrap of the IDNO (www.idno.org)
Developer of    The Polling Booth
www.democracy.org.nz/vote1/



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>