[ga-udrp] Non-member submission from ["Rothnie, Warwick" <WarwickA.Rothnie@msj.com.au>]

["Patrick Corliss" <patrick@quad.net.au>]

----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 11:27 AM
Subject: BOUNCE ga-udrp@dnso.org: Non-member submission from ["Rothnie,
Warwick" <WarwickA.Rothnie@msj.com.au>]


> >From ga-udrp-listadmin@dnso.dnso.org  Tue Jul  3 03:27:16 2001
> Received: from sydmime01.msj.com.au (sydmime01.msj.com.au [203.53.250.25])
> by dnso.dnso.org (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id DAA16608
> for <ga-udrp@dnso.org>; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 03:27:14 +0200 (MET DST)
> Received: from EXCHANGE02.msj.com.au (unverified) by sydmime01.msj.com.au
>  (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.1.5) with ESMTP id
<Tac1001015484f52726@sydmime01.msj.com.au> for <ga-udrp@dnso.org>;
>  Tue, 3 Jul 2001 11:31:51 +1000
> Received: from EXCHANGE10.msj.com.au ([172.24.22.100]) by
EXCHANGE02.msj.com.au with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.3571);
> Tue, 3 Jul 2001 11:27:08 +1000
> content-class: urn:content-classes:message
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
> Disposition-Notification-To: "Rothnie, Warwick"
<WarwickA.Rothnie@msj.com.au>
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.4418.65
> Subject: RE: [ga-udrp] Background Documents
> Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 11:27:08 +1000
> Message-ID: <C8409978F50DFD4C91E61CA67B3E12F5D633E9@EXCHANGE10.msj.com.au>
> X-MS-Has-Attach:
> X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
> Thread-Topic: [ga-udrp] Background Documents
> Thread-Index: AcEDXgmYSHgUJFheRZm87REdigi02wAAHDPg
> From: "Rothnie, Warwick" <WarwickA.Rothnie@msj.com.au>
> To: <ga-udrp@dnso.org>
> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Jul 2001 01:27:08.0683 (UTC)
FILETIME=[46BFB5B0:01C1035F]
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by dnso.dnso.org id
DAA16609
>
> Mallesons Stephen Jaques
> Confidential communication
>
> Eric Dierker said:
>
> > I for one like existing laws
> >and would like to see them enforced and if an UDRP did this I would be
> all for
> >it, otherwise it looks like a mechanism for circumvention of Sovereign
> and
> >legitmate laws.
>
> Since the UDRP expressly contemplates parties pursuing their rights on
> the courts, however, courts will not consider that the sovereignty of
> the laws has been circumvented.  That is the point of allowing parties
> to resort to the courts.  Many arbitration agreements, which are upheld
> by the courts, go even further than the UDRP and preclude court action
> over factual findings.
>
> Warwick A Rothnie
> Partner
> Mallesons Stephen Jaques Melbourne
> Direct line (61 3) 9643 4254
> Fax (61 3) 9643 5999
>
>
> This message was passed to you via the ga-udrp@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-udrp" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-udrp@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-udrp" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html