Re: [ga] nominations

["Sr. Francisco Fanego" <fanego@pccf.net>]

Sorry, I guess I aimed below the belt that time.

Francisco

"Sr. Francisco Fanego" wrote:

> My goodness, I didn't know the Queen was involved!
>
> Francisco
>
> d3nnis wrote:
>
> > I have my gripes about DNSO too, but  I have to tell
> > you that Elisabeth has helped me a lot this weekend to resolve a mail
> > problem that has plagued me on WG-B.
> >
> > >Dennis
> >
> > ----------
> > >
> > > Can we get your commitment to get the books of account open.
> > >
> > > On Sat, 18 Sep 1999, Karl Auerbach wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > somehow i suspect the zero money the dnso secretariat is payed includes 24
> > > > > hour service on weekends.
> > > >
> > > > Agreed, we must thank rather than castigate those who are volunteering
> > > > their time.
> > > >
> > > > > if each person complaining would send a $1,000 check...
> > > >
> > > > Well, the DNSO is a structural part of ICANN.
> > > >
> > > > We should not forget that ICANN is pumping between $2000 and $3000 every
> > > > day, seven days a week, into its law firm.
> > > >
> > > > Nor should we forget that ICANN is paying its CEO about $600 every day,
> > > > seven days a week.
> > > >
> > > > Nor should we forget that ICANN is funding the IANA function to pay for
> > > > the IETF's protocol parameter registrations (but at the same time is not
> > > > offering to do the same for the other bodies in the PSO.)
> > > >
> > > > This is why one of my own goals, were I to pass through the gauntlet and
> > > > be a board member, would be to push for some sane business practices and
> > > > cost control measures.
> > > >
> > > > Maybe that way ICANN could afford to pay for some clerical assistance.
> > > >
> > > >             --karl--
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >