[ga] Mr Rutkowski words about how to build the PSO

["Javier Rodriguez" <jrl@mail.lima.net.pe>]

This is the last words that were lost in cyberspace yesterday... I have become a copycat of myself ;-)

JR

>From: Javier Rodriguez <jrl@mail.lima.net.pe>
>To: ga@dnso.org <ga@dnso.org>
>Subject: Mr Rutkowski words in the building of the PSO

>There was a complain, in the time of the PSO building, about how other
>stakeholders of the internet didnt have due representation on the PSO
>organization.
>
>The suggestion or complain was made by A. M. Rutkowski
>former prof of international law, New York Law School
>former chief of telecommunication regulations and
>   relations between members, counsellor to the
>   Secretary-General, ITU
>
>I take the liberty to quote Mr. Rutkowsi (no modification was made
>to the IETF Poisson Group proposal that was adopted by the
>ICANN as the rules to build the PSO)
>
>Mr Rutkowsi words:
>"What is missing, however, is a liaison participatory
>mechanism for Internet-related standards bodies and
>others who cannot become a MoU signatory.
>
>In the interests of assuring the kind of broad inclusion
>of diverse affected constituencies required in both the White
>Paper and ICANN's own Bylaws, it is suggested that this proposal
>be modified to include additional classes of membership that
>allows substantive liaison and involvement by such organizations
>and others.
>
>Just to make it clear - the ITU staff can effect liaison and informal 
>participation such as exists already in the Government
>Advisory Committee of ICANN or with other standards development
>organizations.  What it cannot do is to be signatory to an
>international agreement which places the ITU in the position
>of continuing governance of a private corporation.
>
>Indeed, the entities most affected by PSO are not organizations
>at all, but private-sector businesses and developers who make use
>of these protocol identifiers in the course of their offerings of
>products and services in the marketplace.  It's not clear how these
>most important constituents would even participate except in a very
>secondary and indirect fashion.  The PSO should be more than just
>a means of exercising governance authority and participation in
>decision making by standards organizations."
>
>Very clever eh ???  but they were not taken in account by the
>Icann board.
>
>Javier
>(ITU is a governamental and carriers organization and for sure that couldnt be
>in the PSO... goverments are intended for the GAC... other thoughts ?)
>
>At 27/10/99 7:48:00 AM, Eva wrote:
>> PSO has 
>>then taken into account something else - representation of organisations 
>>and another kind of who-represents-my-interests.
>>ETSI is a European body. ITU is a worlwide body and if they feel that a 
>>european represent the ITU best - well.......
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Javier Rodriguez                   jrl@mail.lima.net.pe
>AXISNET
>Peruvian Association of Internet Users and ISPs
>Other duties:  eCOM-LAC     ISOC-PERU     IPCE
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Javier Rodriguez                   jrl@mail.lima.net.pe
AXISNET
Peruvian Association of Internet Users and ISPs
Other duties:  eCOM-LAC     ISOC-PERU     IPCE
-----------------------------------------------------------------------