[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ga] RE: [announce] Number of participants in different dnso.orgmaill ing lists



Actually, I think the official list should be announce@dnso.org, and that
all subscribers to each of the WG's and this list should be members of
that list.

It only stands to reason, as it's name implies. That could tie us all
together quite easily.

On Tue, 9 Nov 1999 R.Gaetano@iaea.org wrote:

> are not subscribed to announce@dnso.org. I can understand the willingness to
> avoid the traffic on ga@dnso.org, but I see no point for announce@dnso.org.
> 
> Is there any reason and/or opinion against the implementation of such list
> as "the official list of members of the DNSO"?
> 
> Regards
> Roberto
>