Re: [ga] NC members, censorship and other absurd things

[<idno@tallship.net>]

I hate to respond to mail from crispy crocketts, but notwithstanding any
other potential plans to implement.... I'll second the motion as one of
the models to consider for formal adoption.

  Do we even have a chair to acknowledge this duly seconded motion?

On Thu, 11 Nov 1999, Kent Crispin wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 11, 1999 at 12:38:42PM -0500, vany@sdnp.org.pa wrote:
> > The fact is that we don't have rules that give us (members of the list) to
> > eject the ones that use the list for illegal uses.  Maybe we should draft
> > something as "Terms of Conditions" (I think that ISOC has a good model of
> > it to suscribe to ISTF list).
> 
> I think using the ISOC T&Cs, at least as a starting point, would be a
> great idea.  I move that we do that. 
>