Re: [ga] Agreed

[<idno@tallship.net>]

Roeland and Dan,

I hold the utmost respect for your opinions and positional prowess, and I
appreciate that you both have taken a quaint and rather exceedinlgy polite
approach in calling me to task for my postings with respect to my obvious
distaste for Joop Teersntra (Whom I have called by many inflamatory
explitives) and what I personally see as his manipulative and fraudulent
activities.

I will endeavor to cease from actively mentioning him or seeking to engage
him on this list in an effort to respect your (and other persons) wishes
that we stay focused on GA business here, but cannot gurantee that I will
not immediately rebuke or refute this liar when he attempts to misinform
the members of this list regarding his misdeeds and near criminal conduct.

I think you both know that I am of the type that would subscribe to the
theory that the best way to deal with a snot-nosed brat is to punch him
there, but since Joop Teernstra has not yet been able to usurp my voice as
an individual domain name owner I must state that my bone to pick with him
is still professional rather than personal, and I only seek to make sure
that this hypocrit does not pull the wool over anyone's eyes in a public
or professional forum such as this. A watchdog (foaming Dobermann I will
admit), if you will.

Please accept now my apologies for this tangent and consider my part
finished as long as the other party is willing not to sucker punch me
under the bar as I attempt to turn my back on him for the time being.

-Bradley-

On Thu, 11 Nov 1999, Roeland M.J. Meyer wrote:

> > I fail to see the relevance of this argument to the GA list. 
> > If this were a bar, Id be asking to take it outside.
>