[ga] AT large membership

["Javier Rodriguez" <jrl@mail.lima.net.pe>]

Ok guys, we can continue discussing censorship and other related things,
(true of false), but I wonder that there is many other productive and interesting
things that we are loosing from our sigth... and the AT LARGE election is
the next forum.

I ask myself, and I dont get any answer, what kind of membership can be used
in the AT LARGE that will be democratic, open, etc. etc., whithout getting
this "atmosphere" of "you are rude", "you have a dirty mouth", "you censor me!"...

This list has more or less 500 members... what number of AT LARGE membership
do we expect to participate in the process ?

More people included in the AT LARGE process means MORE democracy, but
at the same time includes MORE noise, trouble, accusations of censorship, and so on.
So what is the level of noise that the Board (old and new) will allow in the
AT LARGE membership forums ?

Is there some comment about the At large membership process, the Council
that will represent the at large membership, and the whole process of electing
the AT LARGE directors for the board ?

Coming from such a wide range of people, from so many different interests,
I would love to see what you think, where are the goods and the bad news
about the At large process and how we can move further in this process.

Is the Geographical distribution guaranteed (sp!) in the At Large process ?

Regards,

Javier
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Javier Rodriguez                     jrl@mail.lima.net.pe
AXISNET                                    VicePresident
Peruvian Association of Internet Users and ISPs
Other duties: ECOMLAC      ISOC -PERU      IPCE
-----------------------------------------------------------------------