Re: [ga] nomination procedures

["Mark C. Langston" <skritch@home.com>]

On 15 November 1999, Jonathan Weinberg <weinberg@mail.msen.com> wrote:


>	The NC has asked for nomination procedures for the GA chair election by
>Friday; it's in our interest actually to supply some.  As an initial
>matter, I see two proposals on the table as to how the GA might nominate X
>(a natural number greater than one) candidates for the position of GA chair:
>
>[1] Each GA member casts X votes (that is, one vote for each of X
>candidates) with preferential weighting (Roberto's proposal)
>[2] Each GA member can vote for as many candidiates as he chooses (my
>proposal -- it's the system we used to "vote" for the DNSO's ICANN Bd
>members).
>
>	Can we get a hum from lurking list members?


I support the motion to select only one candidate to forward to the NC.
I'm tired of being under their thumb.  There's too much power in the NC
and not enough in the GA.  We should be approving what THEY do, not
the other way 'round.

-- 
Mark C. Langston
mark@bitshift.org
Systems Admin
San Jose, CA