Re: [ga] nomination procedures

[John C Klensin <klensin@mci.net>]

--On Monday, 15 November, 1999 07:36 -0800 idno@tallship.net
wrote:

> Would they dare?

I think this is not the question.   The question --especially if
one believes that they are unresponsive and out of control as
several members of the list seem to believe-- is whether your
goal (or Mark's) is to dare them and see how they respond (or,
more extremely, dare them and hope they respond by killing off
the current GA as a source of little but noise).

   john

---------------------


> 
> On Mon, 15 Nov 1999, John C Klensin wrote:
> 
> > --On Tuesday, 16 November, 1999 08:34 +1100 Mark Perkins
> > <MarkP@spc.org.nc> wrote:
> > 
> > > As for the NC by-passing this process and setting up
> > > another procedure, would they not have to amend the rules
> > > effectively removing any democractic role for GA (in
> > > effect abolising it)?
> > 
> > Is that your desired outcome?