Re: [ga] nomination procedures

[<idno@tallship.net>]

On Mon, 15 Nov 1999, Kent Crispin wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 15, 1999 at 07:11:36AM -0800, idno@tallship.net wrote:
> > Even if the NC has, in their agenda, someone other than the single
> > candidate that we put forth, they wouldn't be winning any popular opinion
> > polls with the media if they were to defy our collective will.
> 
> 
> The job at hand is to select a decent slate of candidates, not to 
> spit at the NC.
> 

The Job at hand is to develop a nomination process, and there are now two
proposals duly moved and seconded on the table.

	1.) Single Candidate Proposal
		Moved: Andy gardner
		Seconded: Christopher Ambler

	2.) Two Candidate Proposal
		Moved: Andy Gardner
		Seconded: Christopher Ambler

At some point we will decide amongst the proposals for the system we
decide to present to the NC. The bylaws, (and I'm no atty) do not support
the NC telling us how we will choose our nominees, unless I missed
something.

Besides, I don't see anyone spitting at the NC.