RE: New motion (was Re: [ga] nomination procedures)

["Roeland M.J. Meyer" <rmeyer@mhsc.com>]

Please spell my name correctly, it's Roeland Meyer, extra "e", no "s".

More importantly, and the record will show, I supported Karl Auerbach as a
nominee. I didn't say anything about a single nominee scheme. I was a hasty
reply on my part.

The single nominee scheme is doomed to failure. Actually, ANY nominee scheme
is doomed to failure becasue the NC can simply ignore it and emplace their
own choice, should they deem the rest of us too stupid to know any better (a
default case).

One reason I don't get involved with GA election issues is because they are
pointless, just another mechanism to chase the chickens around the roost and
keep them occupied/distracted. It works too. I'm taking notes for my "How to
run a totalitarian regime...and live" HOW-TO.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ga@dnso.org [mailto:owner-ga@dnso.org]On Behalf Of
> idno@tallship.net

> Yes, I am of the understanding that in order to withdraw a motion one
> would need the consent of the person seconding. I believe
> Andy is of this
> understanding too, and would urge him to reconsider his
> wishes, as he has
> garnered the support of at least 5 individuals on record by
> my count with
> respect to his first motion to put forth one candidate.
>
> Those individuals are, according to my records:
>
> 	1.)	Andy Gardner
> 	2.)	Christopher Ambler
> 	3.)	Myself (Bradley D. Thornton)
> 	4.)	Roeland Myers
> 	5.)	Mark Langston