Re: [ga] Asking for a better and open process

[<idno@tallship.net>]

I would ask just who are the list participants that are members and being
censored, so that I may count them in the tally if they give support or
present a proposal. Some, at least under some names (like the baptista
affair last week) are supposedly fictitious people. Therefore I need some
guidance as to who is real and appropriate and who is not, but will be
happy to count those who are really members but are just being censored.

On Mon, 15 Nov 1999, Javier Rodriguez wrote:

> Dear members of the NC
> Dear administrator of the DNSO lists:
> 
> To finish with this "loooong" story about the
> censorship, and to dont allow that nobody
> call this nomination and election of the chair
> of the GA a "non open and legitimate process",
> I ask you remove any measure or any barrier
> that dont allow posting to some members
> of this community.
> 
> In behalf of a better process I hope that we can
> allow all people to vote.  They have the right,
> without hesitation, not because of his/her merits
> or faults.  They are now the "silent members"
> and until the end of this election time we have
> to preserve the openness (sp!) and transparency
> of the process.
> 
> I hope you understand that here we are dealing
> with something more important that ourselves,
> we are dealing with the transparency of THE
> WHOLE PROCESS.
> 
> With the best regards,
> 
> Javier
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Javier Rodriguez                     jrl@mail.lima.net.pe
> AXISNET                                    VicePresident
> Peruvian Association of Internet Users and ISPs
> Other duties: ECOMLAC      ISOC -PERU      IPCE
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>