[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ga] Sims' legal advice to the NC/Process predetermination

To: ga@dnso.org
Subject: Re: [ga] Sims' legal advice to the NC/Process predetermination
From: Andy Gardner <andy@navigator.co.nz>
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 1999 10:20:14 -0600
In-Reply-To: <199911191903.LAA17854@agamemnon.home.com>
Sender: owner-ga@dnso.org

>   2) The NC expects the GA membership to indicate its level of support
>   for these nominees (e.g., endorsements).

We did that for the ICANN BoD  nominees, and it was ignored completely.
They admitted the people that they knew would support the current board's
hidden adgenda.

Is the NC going to be any different?


Andrew P. Gardner
Support the Cyberspace Association, the constituency of Individual Domain
Name Owners http://www.idno.org

References:
- [ga] Sims' legal advice to the NC/Process predetermination
  - From: "Mark C. Langston" <skritch@home.com>

Prev by Date: [ga] Proposals received for Nominations for the election of a Chair to the GA
Next by Date: RE: [ga] Motion re appointment of nominees for GA chair
Prev by thread: Re: [ga] Sims' legal advice to the NC/Process predetermination
Next by thread: [ga] FW: GA-Chair election procedure proposal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread