RE: [ga] Proof of Identification

["Roeland M.J. Meyer" <rmeyer@mhsc.com>]

Then require two primary trustees. It then takes two to create such a
collusion. It is well known that two DNS advocates can never agree on
anything <grin>.


> On 06-Dec-99 Roeland M.J. Meyer wrote:
> > Patrick is right. A web of trust may be more easily implementable
> > initially.
> > I have personally met Patrick a few times and Mark Langston
> is known to
> > me
> > via a mutual acquaintance. Many others are also known to
> me, well enough
> > that I'd counter-sign their sigs. I am also sure that most
> of the NC can
> > certify that I am real (Since the San Jose NC meeting
> <grin> awa the SF
> > Bay
> > Area meeting with Esther Dyson, last Summer).
>
> The problem with this is that all it takes is one person
> whose identity is
> trusted and who supports the efforts of those whose sole aim
> is to be as
> disruptive as possible.  They can then "trust" those people and their
> identities.
>
> I don't see this as a solution that will acheive the goal here.
>
> --
> William X. Walsh - DSo Internet Services
> Email: william@dso.net  Fax:(209) 671-7934
>