Re: [ga] Reuters: Net name dispute body gets first case

["Ken Stubbs" <kstubbs@dninet.net>]

gee thats funny...

i thought this was a dispute resolution between 2 parties who both agreed to
it.
what has "support" got to do with it. are you suggesting that people line up
and advocate on behalf of one party or the other with the dispute resolution
provider.

maybe we ought to arbitrate it in the newspapers or in some list. . or
better yet lets put up a votebot and take a vote...
kinda like the old roman coliseum ... thumbs up or down !!!





----- Original Message -----
From: Andy Gardner <andy@navigator.co.nz>
To: <ga@dnso.org>
Sent: Monday, December 06, 1999 5:08 PM
Subject: RE: [ga] Reuters: Net name dispute body gets first case


> ><Quote>
> >WIPO quoted Peter Gerrand, chief executive officer of Melbourne IT, as
> >applauding the parties' use of the WIPO dispute resolution service.
> >
> >    "Hopefully, this process will be much more cost-effective and swifter
> >than if they had resorted to the courts. As the registrar concerned,
> >Melbourne IT will simply act upon the decision of the dispute
> >resolution arbitrator," Gerrand said.
> ></Quote>
> >
> >Cost effective, swifter, and more likely to harm due process rights....
>
> And why is the actual domain name being kept quiet? Is that some sort of
> method to reduce potential support for the current owner from slashdot
type
> reactions (like what happened with veronica.org).???
>
>
>
>
>
> Andrew P. Gardner
> Support the Cyberspace Association, the constituency of Individual Domain
> Name Owners http://www.idno.org
>
>
>