RE: [ga] Time to put Baptista online

["William X. Walsh" <william@dso.net>]

This is not William X. Walsh, this is the lovely Joe Baptista.

On Sun, 19 Dec 1999, William X. Walsh wrote:

> Let's not even bring up his name.  His posts to other lists show that his ONLY
> intent is to disrupt here, and that he has no intentions of meaningfully
> participating.  Let's not even talk about him.  That is what he wants, is for
> everyone to be talking about him, and reacting to him.  

Your full of it William.  Anyone here, who is also on the "other" lists
will know that I am currently organizing people to become a potent force
against ICANN.

William Babes - you just never seem to be a happy puppy.

> Letting him back in would be akin to letting a lion into a sheep grazing area,
> merely because it had been a couple months since he last killed a sheep, and
> after all, the lion has rights to.

I'm not going to respond to this - except to say that I am no lamb.

> If the man showed the propensity for meaningful participation, that would be
> one thing.  But instead he shows only that he will escalate his activities.

Love ya William.

Friends are great - but enemies like you can be counted on.  Merry X Mas
to you too.

Regards
Joe Baptista