Re: [ga] Re: Robert's rules

[Joe Baptista <baptista@pccf.net>]

On Thu, 6 Jan 2000, Kent Crispin wrote:

> As was announced at the time, they were removed because they were
> unworkable in the ICANN context, which includes many non-english
> speakers with no knowledge of parliamentary procedure.  The Names 
> Council meetings, in particular, were very chaotic, and those that had 
> knowledge of RRs had a distinct advantage over those who didn't.

Oh I see, we should reduce ourselves to the lowest common denominator.  If
people can't learn new rules of proceedure maybe they should be
dumped.  My recommendation is that we not follow third world standards in
meetings.


Regards
joe Baptista