Re: [ga] PAB rules v. RROR

[Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>]

On Tue, Jan 11, 2000 at 11:34:37AM +1300, Joop Teernstra wrote:
> At 11:52 10/01/00 -0800, Kent Crispin wrote:
> 
> >
> >The PAB rules have the entertaining property of actually having been
> >used, successfully, and in that regard are indeed different from yours. 
> >:-) 
> >
> 
> Kent and all,
> 
> The PAB is not something like the GA.
> Rules that may work for a grouping  relatively united in its purpose will
> not work for an Assembly that is as diverse as a Parliament. 

The PAB had a significant amount of dissent and controversy.  It did 
have the luxury of a membership of high professional caliber.

-- 
Kent Crispin                               "Do good, and you'll be
kent@songbird.com                           lonesome." -- Mark Twain