Re: [ga] PAB Rules v. RROR

["Mark C. Langston" <skritch@home.com>]

On Mon, Jan 10, 2000 at 11:22:39PM -0800, William X. Walsh wrote:
> 
> Mark,
> 
> I have to take exception to something you are using to bolster your argument
> here.
> 
> On 11-Jan-2000 Mark C. Langston wrote:
> > And as *I* pointed out earlier, much of the rules I proposed have been
> > implemented independently in WG-C out of necessity.
> 
> This implies that WG-C is operating under a set of rules that are substantially
> representative of your proposal.  Being a member of that workgroup, I question
> this.  I see no evidence of this being true.
> 


You forget, I'm also a member.

Two post limit is a form of debate limit.
Position papers are equivalent to limiting debate.  Read the definition if
you don't believe me.
The vote just taken is a roll-call vote, plain and simple.  The only thing
that was missing was the chair calling the names.
The vote for chair was too, in essence, though sloppy.
The motions for extending deadlines were just that.
Need I go on?

-- 
Mark C. Langston
mark@bitshift.org
Systems Admin
San Jose, CA