[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ga] PAB rules v. RROR
On Tue, 11 Jan 2000, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
> >Example - our current chairman. Your voting booth indicated that Roberto
> >Gato, our current GA chairman, was the last person anyone here wanted as a
> >chair. We all know he's an IBM appointed wall flower.
thats gato for cat. now I must appoligize - was it the voting boot or the
nominations process? Old age ;-)
Regards
Joe
>
> If you can't spell "Gaetano", that might be true.....nobody voted for "Gato".
> there were 2 polls, one with 3 candidates (vote for one) and one with 6
> candidates (approve or disapprove of each).
>
> The first one gave Roberto 3 votes, me 2 votes, Mark 2 votes. 7 in all.
>
> The second one gave Mark Langston 6 "no opinion", me 3 "no opinion" and 3
> "approve", Roberto the same, Joe Baptista 2 "disapprove" and 4 "no opinion",
> Jeff Williams 3 "disapprove" and 3 "no opinion", Hans Klein 1 "approve" and
> 1 "no opinion", Peter Dengate-Thrush 2 "approve" and 4 "no opinion".
>
> The results seem to show both a very low turnout and Roberto as the winner.
>
> All results taken from
> http://www.democracy.org.nz/vote1/cfm/results.cfm?TID=154
> http://www.democracy.org.nz/vote1/cfm/results2.cfm?TID=155
>
>
> Harald
>
> "pair of facts beats house of supposition"
> --
> Harald Tveit Alvestrand, EDB Maxware, Norway
> Harald.Alvestrand@edb.maxware.no
>