Re: [ga] Proposal for mailing list policy

[Dnsipv6@aol.com]

Mr. Gaetano and everyone else,

  Mr. Gaetano, you comment here seems to be a bit troubling in
it's nature as it seems to be saying you expect Joe Baptista to
purposefully want to create trouble for the DNSO.  I personally have
seen no clear evidence from Joe Baptista that your assertion here
is within reason.  I believe that you are displaying some vendetta
with respect to Joes protest of a couple of weeks back.  This is
not displaying good leadership ability on your part Mr. Gaetano.
I hope you will recant publicly soon...

David "Dude" Jenson
INEGRoup-East Director

In a message dated 1/17/00 1:14:11 AM Pacific Standard Time, 
baptista@pccf.net writes:

<< On Sun, 16 Jan 2000, Roberto Gaetano wrote:
 
 > This has already been clarified, so I don't need to go over it, except 
 > to tell you that I bet that the technique of trying to paralyze the 
 > Canadian Government with a flood of faxes will be applied here, it's 
 > just a matter of time and to find a good excuse.
 
 Your either a liar - and you certainly don't know my business well enough
 to comment on it.  I will assume however that the language barrier caused
 you to be misinformed.
 
 Faxing the canadian government (in fact it was the Ontario) government was
 nothing more then a regular communication session.  back then I used
 government fax machines like email.  these days i just send the whole lot
 of them email.  Like my new "If you Don't Buy ICANN - Don't Buy
 IBM" campaign.  I have selected over 80,000 civil servants for
 that.  Email is much better then fax machines for those type of
 actions.  They take it more personally - as you all do, and they respond
 more appropriately.  it's like training seals with fish.
 
 > So, we can try the iper-liberal approach, but I am aware that, in case 
 > of a similar emergency, we must take a similar decision.
 > The iper-freedom for a few cannot be the denial of service to the 
 > majority. 
 
 that was not a denial of service attack.  After asking the DNSO-LIst admin
 repreatedly why I was not posting to the list, and getting no reply, I
 decided to test using everybody else email address.  You can strick that
 one on an absent admin, or an admin who is a coward.  At the least, he
 failure to reply amounted to my test.
 
 I suggest you retract you accusation of denial of service attack, and I
 ask that you advise the Names Council to also retract that reference from
 the official record.  Because such accusations amount to liable and
 slander.
 
 > Anybody else willing to comment?
 
 It's your turn now - as a member of the NC and our chair, you've just made
 a faux paux.  Let's see if you know how to retract.
 
 Regards
 Joe Baptista
 
 
  >>