[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ga] Final draft of proposed mailing list rules
On Wed, 19 Jan 2000, Per Koelle wrote:
>
> Hi Baptidsta or whatever your name is,
it's in the email header - the proper spelling, so i'm honored you took
the time to misspell it instead of the easier task of cut and paste ;-)
>
> I think its time for someone outside USA or Cannada to
> tell you to SHUT UP !
Well, thank you for telling me and now I shall use the rights and freedoms
won in a democratic society to ignor you and continue communicating.
> You and your fellows (3 or is it 4) must realize, that
> Internet is for the WORLD and NOT an american issue !
Freedoms have nothing to do with america, but everything to do with every
human being on this planet. Feel free to correct me if you feel i'm in
error.
> I think its time that we do all these discussions in another
> language, , for instance danish !
I would be very interested in seeing that sort of thing. I don't think it
will happen, but if it does I think it would be a good thing. Make us
more international and worldly here.
> Du er så dum, at du ikke fatter, at Internettet er
> for voksne mennesker, som ikke har tid til at diskutere
> dine problemer.
Bonjour - com sava. <= french canadaian french ;-)
regards
joe baptista
>
> Kærlig hilsen
> Per kølle
> Danmark
>
> PS.
> Anybody can have this translated into english if they want !
>
>
>
> On Wed, 19 Jan 2000, !Dr. Joe Baptista wrote:
>
> > Well Mr. Touton thank you for bringing us this answer. And now an
> > important question for you. I was censored by the DNSO list admin and the
> > Names Council. As a result of these actions what is the liability of
> > ICANN and the DNSO?
> >
> > I look forward to your well informed legal opinion.
> >
> > And now for my reply to you.
> >
> > On Wed, 19 Jan 2000, James Touton wrote:
> >
> > > 1. There is not other alternative set of rules currently on the table and
> > > from my reading of the posts to this list no call for alternatives was
> > > or has been made. This leaves the General Assembly with not
> > > alternatives.
> >
> > that's "no" alternatives and yes - you are correct.
> >
> > >
> > > 2. The motivation incorporated in Haralds proposal for list rules seems
> > > to be more politically motivated that one of necessity.
> >
> > Not only is it motivated by politics - it's also a necessity for the Names
> > Council to continue this fraud of assuming representation on our behalf.
> >
> > > 3. Filtering by anyone on this list can be self achieved by several methods
> > > available to each participant.
> >
> > correct and well said.
> >
> > Regards
> > Joe Baptista
> >
> > P.S. Won't it be fun if this becomes an international incident, criminal
> > or otherwise.
> >
> > >
> > > Mikki Barry wrote:
> > >
> > > > I agree with Ellen completely. Given that this process has had plenty of
> > > > decisions regarding whose opinions are of value, and who is an 'arrogant
> > > > juvenille' I am not comfortable with people making decisions regarding
> > > > whose voices are the "official" archive and which are "filter fodder."
> > > >
> > > > I am also very concerned at the proclamation that "the ga is not a decision
> > > > making body." As in many parts of this process, many of us thought we were
> > > > getting something besides a rubber stamp for the names council.
> > > > Unfortunately, the manipulations that have already occurred to the process
> > > > have laid the groundwork for complete distrust in any mechanism by which
> > > > individuals can choose to silence others, regardless of how annoying they
> > > > are.
> > >
> > > James Touton
> > > Legal advisory committee member
> > > INEGroup
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > __________________________________________
> > > NetZero - Defenders of the Free World
> > > Get your FREE Internet Access and Email at
> > > http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> Mvh.
> Per Koelle
> DK Hostmaster
> e-mail: info@dk-hostmaster.dk
> tlf: +45 70 23 90 70
> fax: +45 70 23 90 79
>
>