Re: [ga] So far, 28 poll answers logged

["!Dr. Joe Baptista" <baptista@pccf.net>]

Why does the IDNO SC just setup another idno and focus on membership.

On Thu, 20 Jan 2000, Andy Gardner wrote:

> >The truth of the matter, Joop, since you brought it up here, is that YOU
> >asserted YOURSELF into the Steering Committee despite having declined normal
> >election to that position, and then when the Steering Committee members wanted
> >to bring issues to vote, if you didn't agree with them, they were never put on
> >the ballot.  You had the keys, and you vetoed anything you didn't agree with.
> >The steering committee was a farce you created to bolster your own little
> >personal power game to try and give yourself an inflated role in the ICANN
> >process.
> >
> >The evidence is clear, and the rest of the SC can and will vouch for that.
> 
> As a member of the knee-capped SC, I can vouch that the above is exactly
> what happened.
> 
> The majority of the SC wanted to move the IDNO website to a faster (free)
> server in the USA and ramp up the operation.
> 
> Joop didn't want to, so the vote never got included in the polling booth.
> As Joop possesses the mailing list for the IDNO membership, one-sided
> e-mails are send to the entire membership whenever there is a vore taking
> place that he views is important, with subtle (or more often, unsubtle)
> hints on how he thinks they should vote.
> 
> Even though he was not a member of the Steering Committee (although, this
> was only to provide an "optical illusion" to outsiders - his own words), he
> proceeded to close the SC down and move complete control of the IDNO back
> to himself.
> 
> It all went downhill from there.
> 
> I guess that's why Bradley now calls it the JDNO - Joop's Domain Name
> Organisation.
> 
> 
> Andrew P. Gardner
> 
> Never suggest to your Mother to shop on-line for a pearl necklace.
> 
>