RE: [ga] Re: Proposal for list rules/actions

["William X. Walsh" <william@dso.net>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 25-Jan-2000 Patrick Greenwell wrote:
> Finally, if positions are going to be collected, and action is taken
> based on the expression of those positions, let's call them what they
> are: VOTES and not "opinion polls." 

How would you decide who was eligible to vote?  Do we let the multiple
personality posting as INEGroup "staff" have a vote for each of his aliases? 
And not to attack Kent in any fashion, but he has also point out that he has
dummy aliases on this list to counter effects of others who may be doing this.  

I have a problem with letting the GA decide anything by a direct vote at this
stage.

- --
William X. Walsh <william@dso.net>
DSo Networks  http://dso.net/
Fax: 877-860-5412 or +1-559-851-9192
GPG/PGP Key at http://dso.net/wwalsh.gpg
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: DSo Networks

iD8DBQE4jkvy8zLmV94Pz+IRAhQvAKDkYrx0u0DHGoFg5y0MzwLS0CNepQCg6bCg
lgqt9hTjxGsaIFIOc8pmFRw=
=EoD9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----