Re: [ga] no matter may pass out of the DNSO without the explicit approval of the ga

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Mark and all,

  All good worthwhile suggestions.  I will bring this up tomorrow before
our members for their serious consideration.  I would add a caveat of the
following:

  Mr. Gaetano has no place to expressly mandate anything as he is
not a legitimate Chair due to the very SELECTIVE CENSORSHIP
that has been actively practiced.  That not just Karl Auerbach should be
determined to this suggestion.  That it is already well known that
SELECTIVE CENSORSHIP has occurred and what remedies to correct
this form of disenfranchising from the pNC, DNSO GA list admin., and
the illegitimate NC and additional ICANN Board members.

Mark Measday wrote:

> Now we are getting somewhere.
>
> 1. Request Mr Gaetano expressly mandate Mr Auerbach to take whatever steps are
> required to accomplish a clear statement of the above powers within ICANN rules in
> time for the Cairo conference with a view to making a formal presentation of the
> ambit and powers of the ga at that conference.
>
> 2. Also propose that ga assign itself rights to propose and dispose of DNSO
> constituency representatives for malfeasance, etc, should those rights not already
> be in place.
>
> 3. Request subcommittee be set up to discuss 'pure' censorship issues and discussion
> of such matters be adjourned sine die or until such time as the committee reports.
>
> MM
>
> Karl Auerbach wrote:
>
> > > If you MUST discuss this, at least stop telling lies about what the rules say.
> >
> > So what do "the rules" say.  As far as I know, there are no rules in yet in
> > effect.
> >
> > And as I've said, if this group wants to cause my immediate departure, then it can
> > adopt censorship, or worse, declare censorship by fiat from on-high.
> >
> > > This discussion is, for the most part moot, and is right now the single largest
> > obstacle to getting real substantive discussion going. If you want substantive
> > discussion nobody is stopping you.
> >
> > How about this:
> >
> > There is an item on the floor, a remnant from the LA ICANN meeting about
> > the GA obtaining the power such that no matter may pass out of the DNSO
> > without the explicit approval of the GA.
> >
> > As far as I see it, a GA that has no power is a pretty sad thing when that
> > GA is being sold as an alternative to "constituency" status for those who
> > aren't among the select few special interests.
> >
> > So, pick up the challange: change the subject line and start talking about
> > how the GA becomes something more than an excuse.
> >
> >                 --karl--
>
> --
> _____________________________________________________________________
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> The contents of this e-mail are confidential to the ordinary user of
> the e-mail address to which it was addressed and may also be
> privileged.  If you are not the addressee of this e-mail you may not
> copy, forward, disclose or otherwise use it or any part of it in any
> form whatsoever.  If you have received this e-mail in error please
> e-mail the sender by replying to this message.
> ______________________________________________________________________

Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman INEGroup (Over 95k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number:  972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208