Re: Discussion Group - Was: [ga] Re: electoral fraud by the ga chair

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Roberto and all,

Roberto Gaetano wrote:

> Joop,
>
> You wrote:
>
> >It would be better to give the GA members a bit more choice than that.
> A
> >WG , such as WG-D could try to come up with better tuned list rules
> that
> >would find wider approval than indicated by the last poll.
> >
>
> Absolutely agree.
>
> There has been already a proposal on the establishment of task-oriented
> mailing lists, sort of focused discussion groups.
>
> Nothing prevents us to start one on the subject.
> The change of focus of an existing WG, or the establishment of a new one
> , requires OTOH action by the NC, while to start a "Discussion Group"
> can be done immediately.
>
> If, at the end of the three months period with the new rules, we have
> better proposals, we will take them into account and vote on them.

  Who is "WE"?  I hope you arerefering to the General Assembly.

>
>
> Regards
> Roberto

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman INEGroup (Over 95k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number:  972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208