[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ga] GA Rules don't go far enough
William,
Your suggestion is ok for a government organization that has
some pretty stringent accountability requirements, but not worth
anything for a private company without good accountability. I also
don't see an adequate privacy statement or accreditation for the
ICANN or this DNSO as well.
David "Dude" Jenson
In a message dated 2/14/00 3:10:09 PM Pacific Standard Time, william@dso.net
writes:
<< -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I again renew my call that all members of the GA list must validate by some
form of identification, such as a govt. issued ID.
It is way too easy for people with AOL accounts or any of the numerous free
email/ISP services to just create new/additional aliases.
I am prepared to send in a copy of my state issued ID, and I see no reason
why
this should not be a requirement. Many conferences require the same type of
thing at check-in, so this would be no different. Otherwise we will
continue
to be subjected to the PCCF's and INEGroup's numerous aliases and attempts to
disrupt, and who knows who else who might be participating with the intent to
disrupt.
- --
William X. Walsh <william@dso.net>
DSo Networks http://dso.net/
Fax: 877-860-5412 or +1-559-851-9192
GPG/PGP Key at http://dso.net/wwalsh.gpg
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: DSo Networks >>
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html