RE: [ga] Proposal: WWW / slashdot

[Jean-Michel Becar <Jean-Michel.Becar@etsi.fr>]

Mr Baptista,

As I'm a honest citizen I don't care to provide or to share any of my
private information with any body. Why are you so reluctant? I always
thought that only people having something to hide would hide their identity.
But I do not think it's your case, so what's the problem?

Jean-Michel Becar
ETSI Project Manager
www.etsi.org
Tel: +33 4 92 94 43 15
Fax: +33 4 92 38 52 15
GSM: +33 6 82 80 19 31


-----Original Message-----
From: !Dr. Joe Baptista [mailto:baptista@pccf.net]
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2000 11:22 AM
To: Jean-Michel Becar
Cc: 'Harald Tveit Alvestrand'; ga@dnso.org; list@ifwp.org
Subject: RE: [ga] Proposal: WWW / slashdot


not in the icann cards - nor do I expect icann for reasons of privacy to
share any information with the ga nitwits.

On Mon, 28 Feb 2000, Jean-Michel Becar wrote:

> Harald,
> 
> Yes of course, I wrote this Email earlier in the morning and I only though
> afterwards I was writing something not enough open for our process. BTW I
> like your idea to use the At Large membership system to subscribe to the
ga.
> Dear ga members could we go for a discussion on that.
> 
> Jean-Michel Becar
> E.T.S.I.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand [mailto:Harald@Alvestrand.no]
> Sent: Monday, February 28, 2000 8:26 AM
> To: Jean-Michel Becar; Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law;
> ga@dnso.org
> Subject: RE: [ga] Proposal: WWW / slashdot
> 
> 
> At 05:44 28.02.00 +0000, Jean-Michel Becar wrote:
> >Harald, Michael,
> >
> >But the way the At Large members is registered via this Web Interface
could
> >be an example for the GA membership.
> >But the way the proof of identity is done (by sending a postal mail to
the
> >pysical address with a PIN code to be used for accessing to the web site)
> >would cost too much for the GA.
> >So why not to set up a web site where people can registrer themselves and
> >for the proof of identity and interest in the GA DNSO, they should
provide
> a
> >domain name that can be verified with a whois request if the domain name
> >holder is the same as the member.
> 
> and if they don't hold any domain names?
> For those that do, it's possible - but we'll have to do something for the 
> rest. (And, of course, domain names can cost down to USD 10 these days)
> 
> another idea I had - what if we considered an activated At Large
membership 
> necessary and sufficient for voting rights in the GA?
> This would have a couple of advantages:
> 
> - ICANN has to do the verification work anyway, so it's only done once
> - More active use of the ICANN membership code gives more chance that 
> weaknesses in the system will be found and corrected
> - It's a drive (a small one) for At Large membership
> 
> Of course, this leaves us without the power to impose or enforce our own 
> membership rules, requires people to be willing to sign up for At Large 
> membership, and requires that the people running the At Large are willing 
> to share at least some information.
> 
> But it's an idea.
> 
>                        Harald
> 
> 
> --
> Harald Tveit Alvestrand, EDB Maxware, Norway
> Harald.Alvestrand@edb.maxware.no
> 
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> 
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html