RE: [ga] Older registrations

[Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>]

At 12:42 PM 3/20/00 -0800, Christopher Ambler wrote:
> >> In 1995/1996, IANA solicited new iTLD requests under the guidelines laid
> >                     *********
> >Not fact.
>
>Um, yes, fact. Please see the supporting documents in IOD's suit of 1997
>for proof.

They constitute claims, not proof.

They might be treated as proof if the judge agreed with IOD.

He didn't.  Strongly didn't.


At 12:53 PM 3/20/00 -0800, Christopher Ambler wrote:
>The agreement is part of the public record in IOD's 1997 suit. Please
>refer to the declaration of Jon Postel to see that it was neither
>denied nor corrected. Interesting in that Manning never filed one.

It's interesting that you keep refusing to acknowledge how soundly the 
judge rejected IOD's position.

Many things are interesting.

But, no, you are not allowed to draw an affirmative conclusion from an 
omission.

Saying that Postel's statement represents support for IOD's claim that IANA 
gave IOD permission is simply making a false statement.

d/

=-=-=-=-=
Dave Crocker  <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
Brandenburg Consulting  <www.brandenburg.com>
Tel: +1.408.246.8253,  Fax: +1.408.273.6464
675 Spruce Drive,  Sunnyvale, CA 94086 USA

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html