Re: [ga] About GA membership again......

["Christopher Ambler" <cambler@iodesign.com>]

> Yes, the USG did create a process that bears their imprimatur.  They still
have
>  to approve the results, as a matter of fact.

The USG created a process for ICANN over the past couple of years. But
we're talking about 1995 and 1996 here, when IANA was presumably in
charge. You're saying that they were not in charge. If they were not in
charge, then who was? Please show me the "authorized process" that
was in place in 1995. I followed IANA. You're now telling me that IANA
was not the "authorized process." I don't agree, but I'm willing to concede
the point if you can document yours.

Christopher

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html