[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [ga] About GA membership again......
Harald,
Thank you for this clarification. To me this is quite clear, and the way to
organize this is probably well-known to any organization with members:
Organizations are members of DNSO. There is a membership database containing
(at least) name of membership org.
address and other coordinates
constituency(ies)
name and coordinates of persons representing the org. in
this context
One (and only one) of these persons should be ticked off as
"voting person in the DNSO GA".
Simple, isn't it?
Did I forget something? What about individuals in the GA not representing an
organization? Is "At-Large" for individuals and DNSO for organizations?
Best regards,
Alf H
.NO
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ga@dnso.org [mailto:owner-ga@dnso.org]On Behalf Of Harald
> Alvestrand
> Sent: 28. mars 2000 01:09
> To: William X. Walsh; John Palmer
> Cc: ga@dnso.org
> Subject: Re: [ga] About GA membership again......
>
>
> Gentlemen......could we please attempt to talk about who should be able to
> be members of the GA?
>
> I take it that nobody's advocating that a person can get more
> votes in the
> GA by virtue of representing a constituency member, or that people who do
> not represent constituency members can't be GA members.
> (Constituencies consist of organizations; the GA consists of individuals.
> That's an important difference.)
>
> Harald
>
>
>
> --
> Harald Tveit Alvestrand, EDB Maxware, Norway
> Harald.Alvestrand@edb.maxware.no
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html