RE: [ga] Direct Evidence, as asked

["Christopher Ambler" <cambler@iodesign.com>]

Really? Then you relegate CORE to the list of the unauthorized,
too? Surely IANA either had authority or not...

Wow, surprising, Kent...

--
Christopher Ambler
chris@the.web


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ga@dnso.org [mailto:owner-ga@dnso.org]On Behalf Of Kent
Crispin
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2000 10:13 PM
To: ga@dnso.org
Subject: Re: [ga] Direct Evidence, as asked


On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 09:50:51PM -0800, Simon Higgs wrote:
> At 08:10 PM 3/30/00 -0800, Christopher Ambler wrote:
>
> >I believe, that we can place April 4, 1997 as the cutoff date
> >for any consideration of pioneer preference based on IANA's
> >actions.
>
> I'd make that cut-off date June 25, 1997. Before that date, NSI were still
> requesting permission to add TLDs. The NSF wrote back to NSI on that date
> with specific instructions. See:
>
> http://name.space.xs2.net/law/answers/letters/NSF-NSI06251997.jpg

I'm with William on this one -- Jan 1, 1900.

--
Kent Crispin                               "Do good, and you'll be
kent@songbird.com                           lonesome." -- Mark Twain
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html