Re: [ga] About GA membership again......

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Peter and all assembly members,

  If by the term "Consensus" on these matters regarding TLD's
that are already running on some number of ISP's I would have to
say given the off the cuff number of ISP's you mention, that some form
of "Consensus" is already determined.

  On the other hand in order to determine if a "Real Consensus" is
so, we the stakeholders need to have a VOTE to determine that
"Real Consensus" is met.

Peter de Blanc wrote:

> Re: The press release: "ADNS NEWSLETTER: ASLAN SERVER VISIBILITY JUMPS..."
>
> Perhaps a bit pushy- however...
>
> I feel there is some merit in considering the past work in alternative or
> 'additional' TLDs. There is a thin line between what 'might' have been
> experiments in the true 'RFC' sense of consensus formation, regarding
> insertion of new TLDs, and some of the almost 'Pirate like' underground
> activities that developed around 'Alternic' and other groups.
>
> If, for example, there was a root server in switzerland, called 'Z', and it
> contained 'alternative', 'enhanced' 'additional' TLD's, and 1000 or so of
> the worlds major ISP's updated their DNS cache from it, there 'might' be
> enough consensus to make the new TLDs 'valid enough'.
>
> The point I am making is, with consensus, anything can happen.
>
> With enough consensus, new TLDs can be inserted into the 'A' root server as
> well.
>
> Perhaps we can measure our success here in the GA, and in ICANN in general,
> by the speed with which we can form consensus.
>
> Since we have this forum, why not see if we can increase our speed of
> consensus formation WRT new TLDs? And if some of those potential new TLDs
> happen to be the ones in the 'alternative root' systems, would it matter?
>
> Peter de Blanc
> .VI Admin
>
> Simon Higgs wrote:
> >
> >
> >I'd also like to propose that the pre-IAHC work with IANA be recognized
> ,
> >and that an iTLD constituency be created. Constituents can from known
> >contributors to the Jon Postel new TLD/registry drafts, or other new
> >TLD/registry Internet Drafts published during 1996, or are named on the
>
> >iTLD applicant list that Jon Postel published on behalf of IANA to
> >iahc-discuss. The purpose of the iTLD Constituency is to create new
> >registries that will compete at the registry-level with NSI (currently
> no
> >competition exists for gTLDs or rTLDs at the registry-level).
> >
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman INEGroup (Over 95k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number:  972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html