Re: [ga] Re: NCtelecon, 18 April 2000, results

["William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 20-Apr-2000 Christopher Ambler wrote:
> In other words, the NC has the ability to declare, without any
> supporting evidence, that any resolution that they don't like just
> doesn't have consensus. With this ability, the names council's
> recommendations to ICANN are simply what the names
> council wants. Nothing more. Those items they agree with,
> they call consensus-based. Those that they disagree with, they
> claim there is no consensus (as they have done here).
> 
> I'll make this very clear: THIS IS AN ABUSE OF POWER.

Someone should post Shepard's message from WG-C about why he felt compelled to
vote against it.

Sheesh, these people don't even come up with half way decent excuses anymore. 

- --
William X. Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
http://userfriendly.com/
GPG/PGP Key at http://userfriendly.com/wwalsh.gpg
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1c (Mandrake Linux)
Comment: Userfriendly Networks http://www.userfriendly.com/

iD8DBQE4/6F78zLmV94Pz+IRAk/bAKCqNVzXKkpxoQbzxvAlBoBVPdG0JQCfVwYM
kuLcTPYa/CgWLEcVr284HPE=
=Vc9s
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html