[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ga] Re: [ga-full] Re: NCtelecon, 18 April 2000, results
thank you for the clarification.
On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, DNSO Listadmin wrote:
>
> "Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law" <froomkin@law.miami.edu> wrote:
> >
> > I hate the passive voice. Who exactly was the source of this
> > "confirmation" please.
> >
> ==>
> The written minutes and interpretations of decision's
> meetings request a lot of prudence, and even then mistakes
> happen.
>
> With regards to the last NC telecon, I carrefully checked with
> Louis Touton who voted for what in the two straw polls before
> publishing them, and giving numbers.
> Roberto requested important clarification, therefore I looked
> up my notes, and needed the second confirmation (or not) from
> ICANN staff attending the telecon. I got this confirmation
> from Louis Touton.
> I believe all of this is an ordinary way of doing,
> but it may happen my sentence was awkward, at least it is what
> I understand from your message.
>
> In http://www.dnso.org/wgroups/wg-c/Arc01/msg01887.html
> you will find a detailed summary of the portions of the
> Names Council meeting on Tuesday most relevant to WG-C,
> written by Jonathan Weinberg.
>
> Elisabeth Porteneuve
>
> > On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, DNSO Listadmin wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Roberto,
> > >
> > > I was confirmed that the third meaning is the correct one.
> > > This of course relates to Art. VI-B, Section 2(d), of the ICANN bylaws,
> > > which gives the NC the responsibilty to determine "community consensus."
> > >
> > > Elisabeth Porteneuve
> > >
> > > [ To: ga@dnso.org, council@dnso.org ]
> > >
> > > -------- Original Message --------
> > > Subject: [council] [ga] NCtelecon, 18 April 2000, results
> > > Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 20:01:28 +0200 (MET DST)
> > > From: "Roberto Gaetano" <roberto.gaetano@voila.fr>
> > > Reply-To: roberto.gaetano@voila.fr
> > > To: <DNSO.Listadmin@dnso.org>
> > > CC: <ga@dnso.org>, <council@dnso.org>
> > >
> > > Dear Listadmin,
> > >
> > > One thing I do not understand in the report from the NC (http://
> > > www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga/Arc04/msg00346.html), i.e. the exact meaning
> > > of the text of question 2:
> > >
> > > "Did the Names Council believe it was the consensus that the initial
> > > number for roll out should be 6 to 10 new gTLDs ?"
> > >
> > > What does it mean?
> > >
> > > "Does the NC have consensus (in the NC) that the initial number ....."
> > > or
> > > "Does the NC believe that in the WG-C there was consensus that the
> > > initial number ...."
> > > or
> > > "Does the NC believe that in the Internet community there is consensus
> > > that the initial number ...."
> > > or other.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > Roberto
> > > --
> > > This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> > > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > > ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> > > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> >
> > A. Michael Froomkin | Professor of Law | froomkin@law.tm
> > U. Miami School of Law, P.O. Box 248087, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
> > +1 (305) 284-4285 | +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax) | http://www.law.tm
> > -->It's warm here.<--
> >
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> >
> >
>
--
A. Michael Froomkin | Professor of Law | froomkin@law.tm
U. Miami School of Law, P.O. Box 248087, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
+1 (305) 284-4285 | +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax) | http://www.law.tm
-->It's warm here.<--
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html