Re: [ga] court curbs icann

[Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>]

On Thu, May 18, 2000 at 11:21:26AM -0700, Roeland Meyer E-mail" wrote:
> Hello Dori,
> 
> This is a significant statement, can you please forward the URL?

I'm not sure why it's significant -- it is explicitly stated that a 
udrp result doesn't prevent you from continuing in court, so obviously 
courts aren't bound by udrp results.  Is there something else going on? 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ga@dnso.org [mailto:owner-ga@dnso.org]On Behalf Of
> Dori Kornfeld
> Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2000 11:01 AM
> To: ga@dnso.org
> Subject: [ga] court curbs icann
> 
> Court Curbs Power of ICANN
> The National Law Journal
> In the first ruling of its kind, a federal judge in Illinois said
> that courts are not bound by the administrative proceedings of
> the organization established to provide management of the
> Internet domain-name system, the Internet Corp. for Assigned
> Names and Numbers or ICANN.
> 
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

-- 
Kent Crispin                               "Do good, and you'll be
kent@songbird.com                           lonesome." -- Mark Twain
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html