Re[2]: [ga] List Rule(s) Proposal: Disorderly Words

["William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>]

Hello Mark,

Wednesday, June 07, 2000, 12:55:31 AM, you wrote:

MM> Harald,

MM> You should use this instead. Rationale below.

MM> 'Disorderly words should be taken down by the member who objects to them, or by
MM> the moderator, and then presented to the member. If he denies them, the
MM> assembly shall decide by a vote whether they are his words or not. If a member
MM> cannot justify the words he used, and will not suitably apologise for them, it
MM> is the duty of the assembly to act in the case. If the disorderly words are of

No thanks, thats a non-started.  This would tie the assembly up in
endless votes on members, etc.  It is unnecessary and would only lead
to further disenfranchisement of the assembly members.

BTW, there is no need to forward these messages to Jeff directly.  He
gets the GA list still, he was not removed from it.  He only had his
posting rights suspended, for cause.

-- 
Best regards,
 William                            mailto:william@userfriendly.com


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html