<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [ga] Voting rules, take 4
At 10:52 23.06.2000 -0700, Roeland Meyer \(E-mail\) wrote:
>1) The actual voting system needs to be simple, with both email
>and web-based interfaces.
Simplicity I agree with.
>2) The number of issues, per voting event, needs to be few and
>controlled.
Agreed. That's why I prefer a human in the loop here.
The risk of capture is real, however; any human (or group of humans)
who gets veto powers on ballots needs a mechanism for his removal.
>3) Voting events need to be strictly periodic, no ad hoc voting
>events. (min. 90-day periods)
Don't agree. This depends on the nature of the issue. 90 days is
a LONG time for some issues (such as voting on the GA's opinion on
the Sunrise+20 proposal, for instance).
For elections, I would tend to sympathize.
>4) All voters need to be absolutely authenticated, within the
>system.
"Absolutely" is a word I dislike. Fair and reasonably secure
mechanisms for authentication, I agree fully with.
>5) Churn needs to be minimized.
As in "don't vote on an issue we just finished voting on"? Yes.
>6) Each registered voter gets exactly one vote.
Agreed.
Harald
--
Harald Tveit Alvestrand, EDB Maxware, Norway
Harald.Alvestrand@edb.maxware.no
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|