Re[3]: [ga] FW: UPDATE: ICANN-Yokohama Remote Participation Details

["William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>]

Hello Simon,

Sunday, July 09, 2000, 3:38:05 PM, you wrote:

> At 03:10 PM 7/9/00 -0700, William X. Walsh wrote:
>>Sunday, July 09, 2000, 2:14:13 PM, you wrote:
>>
>> > Roberto,
>>
>> > Prior applications submitted under should really be an agenda item.
>> > Responsibility for these prior applications has been assumed by ICANN 
>> under
>> > the "USC/ICANN Transition Agreement". The receiving of delegation requests
>> > is specifically mandated in the "Contract Between ICANN and the United
>> > States Government for Performance of the IANA Function":
>>
>>There are no prior applications.

> The facts seem to disagree with you:

No, the facts agree with me.  Let me be more direct about it.

There are no prior applications that have any legal standing now.

You can apply for ownership of a tollbridge in New York, that doesn't
make your application have any basis in reality.  Much like your self
claimed TLDs (of which nearly all do not have, and have never had,
live registries, so they are nothing more than undeveloped self
claimed TLDs without any real authority or sanction).

Go back to your dreamland, Simon.  This is reality.  Stop playing
games now.

-- 
Best regards,
 William                            mailto:william@userfriendly.com


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html