RE: Re[2]: [ga] FW: UPDATE: ICANN-Yokohama Remote Participation Details

["Roeland M.J. Meyer" <rmeyer@mhsc.com>]

Actually, there was. That the request was denied is another
story. But history insists that proposals were requested and an
application was submitted, along with a payment. That they
(IANA/Postel) changed their mind and handed back the application
and payment, the very next day, is yet another issue. All other
claims cannot deny this real event, value-judgements aside.

Interpretations are yet another issue. But, please remember that
interpretations are not the events themselves. The facts don't
change.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ga@dnso.org [mailto:owner-ga@dnso.org]On Behalf Of
William
> X. Walsh
> Sent: Sunday, July 09, 2000 3:10 PM
> To: Simon Higgs
> Cc: ga@dnso.org
> Subject: Re[2]: [ga] FW: UPDATE: ICANN-Yokohama Remote
Participation
> Details
>
>
> Hello Simon,
>
> Sunday, July 09, 2000, 2:14:13 PM, you wrote:
>
> > At 11:50 AM 7/9/00 +1000, Dassa wrote:
>
> > Roberto,
>
> > Prior applications submitted under should really be an agenda
item.
> > Responsibility for these prior applications has been
> assumed by ICANN under
> > the "USC/ICANN Transition Agreement". The receiving of
> delegation requests
> > is specifically mandated in the "Contract Between ICANN and
> the United
> > States Government for Performance of the IANA Function":
>
> There are no prior applications.  Face it Simon, you won't get
your
> gold mine handed to you by ICANN.
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>  William
mailto:william@userfriendly.com
>
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html