Re[5]: [ga] FW: UPDATE: ICANN-Yokohama Remote Participation Details

["William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>]

Hello Simon,

Monday, July 10, 2000, 12:31:53 AM, you wrote:


> And my original point is that there is a legally binding contractual 
> obligation, via the "USC/ICANN Transition Agreement" and "Contract Between 
> ICANN and the United States Government for Performance of the IANA 
> Function", for ICANN to receive and evaluate these requests.

If you believe that, then sue the USG and ICANN now, because they will
not pay any attention to those "requests."  Rightfully so.

> What part of that didn't you understand, Rick?

I think he understood perfectly.  Will you take ICANN and the USG to
court, Simon?   Your claim will be laughed out.

-- 
Best regards,
 William                            mailto:william@userfriendly.com


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html