Re: [council] Re: Re[3]: [ga] Elections

[Jonathan Cohen <jcohen@shapirocohen.com>]

Dear YJ
I look forward to the opportunity of participating even if you were writing to
J. Weinberg
Best Regards

Jonathan Cohen

YJ Park wrote:

> Dear Jonathan,
>
> Names Council teleconference was just finished and NC has made sure
> DNSO Review task force is going to facilitate the communications
> between any relevant group and Names Council.
>
> Therefore, my understanding after talking this with Theresa and Ken
> during the NC meeting is you can participate in the DNSO review TK
> and mostly welcomed to give your inputs based upon your expertise
> and experiences.
>
> Thanks,
>
> YJ
>
> > Absolutely correct.
> >
> > (I wish I was able to express myself so clearly)
> >
> > Roberto
> >
> > P.S.: action point for me noted - I will get back to the GA with the
> > list. I can already anticipate that they are one per Constituency, plys
> > yours truly.
> >
> >
> > > My understanding:
> > >
> > > The NC decided a review of the DNSO should be undertaken using *two*
> > >bodies: a "Task Force" and a WG.  The Task Force was formed by
> > invitation
> > >only,  with members nominated by each of the constituencies.  To my
> > >knowledge, the names of the Task Force members have not been made
> > public.
> > >(Roberto, can you tell us who they are?)  The Task Force is putting
> > >together a workplan for the rest of the review process; its draft
> > document
> > >has also not been made public.  Once the workplan is completed and
> > approved
> > >by the NC, the NC will issue a call for rank-and-file members to enlist
> >  in
> > >the working group.
> > >
> > >Roberto, is this correct?
> > >
> > >Jon
> > >
> > >
> > >Jonathan Weinberg
> > >weinberg@msen.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >At 08:41 PM 8/14/00 +0200, Roberto Gaetano wrote:
> > >>Michael,
> > >>
> > >>Sorry for the confusion.
> > >>As I expalined in a previous post, the document is the initial
> > document
> > >>that is circulating in the Task Force to define the scope of work.
> > >>
> > >>You did not miss anything.
> > >>
> > >>Regards
> > >>Roberto
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>
> > >>>That's amazing.  What kind of notice got sent to ICANN mailing list
> > >>>members?  Am I no longer on the relevant list?
> > >>>
> > >>>On Mon, 14 Aug 2000, Roberto Gaetano wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> The NC Task Force is at work, I am part of it.
> > >>>> The deadline for comments on the initial document is today.
> > >>>
> > >>>--
> > >>> Please visit http://www.icannwatch.org
> > >>>A. Michael Froomkin   |    Professor of Law    |   froomkin@law.tm
> > >>>U. Miami School of Law, P.O. Box 248087, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
> > >>>+1 (305) 284-4285  |  +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax)  |  http://www.law.tm
> > >>>                        -->It's hot here.<--
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>--
> > >>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > >>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > >>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > >>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >--
> > >This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > >Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > >("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > >Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> >


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html