<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] new TLDs
At 11:26 PM 8/31/00 -0400, Attyross@aol.com wrote:
Thanks for sharing Otho. This is old news. And it doesn't have to happen
this way.
May I point out that the get-rich-quick crowd (CORE demonstrated this
mentality to us in 1997) subscribe to this doctrine. Others, like myself,
who have more concern for the stability of the internet, know how to
introduce new TLDs without the land rush.
The problem is we don't know if ICANN is serious this time around (this is
the third time around for me), or whether it's just a money raising
exercise @ $50,000 per application with no guarantees, while selling out to
special interests behind the scenes.
The amount of money is much less important than the stability of the
application process. Without some kind of assurance, the application
process can only be perceived as unstable.
>OK. I rarely post to this list, but I have something to say.
>I have received several emails recently that basically said
>everybody will immediately register everything in any new TLD
>that is put up. I don't know if this is good or not. Yes, I am
>in the IP group, but I am independent and I thought I should
>share this observation.
>Otho Ross
Best Regards,
Simon Higgs
--
It's a feature not a bug...
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|