Re[6]: [ga] Individual domain name holders and the DNSO

["William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>]

Hello Roeland,

Monday, September 11, 2000, 3:32:57 PM, you wrote:


> Then it wasn't relevent. My point was that no other constituency has
> this burden, yet Roberto implies that the individual domain names
> holders constituency, whatever that is, should accept a burden that no
> one else has to carry. This is simply unfair.

In my opinion, you are reading much more into Roberto's comments than
is there.  But in any event, any new constituency that was not a part
of the original constituencies created by ICANN will have burdens that
the initial ones did not.  This is codified in the bylaws.

Right or wrong (and I agree it is one of many flaws in the entire
constituency structure) it is codified in the bylaws.


-- 
Best regards,
 William                            mailto:william@userfriendly.com


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html