Re[4]: [ga] RE: [idno] Who said the IDNO welcome diversity?

["William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>]

Hello Roeland,

Tuesday, September 12, 2000, 10:55:05 PM, you wrote:
>> The issue, the nature of what has been a "proposed" constituency,
>> properly belonged on the GA list.

> No, I don't think so. The creation of new consstituencies is strictly
> the pervue of the ICANN BoD. The /ICANN/DNSO/GA has no power there.

It most certainly is a subject here, Roeland, as Joop's incessant
posts of late on this list about the IDNO and its "application" are
evident proof of.

I find it amusing the double standard you apply, Joop's posts are on
topic, criticisms aren't.

Spare me.  This is the kind of intolerance that the IDNO supporters
have become so known for.

-- 
Best regards,
 William                            mailto:william@userfriendly.com


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html