<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] DNSO Review
At 05:40 PM 9/15/00 +0200, Roberto Gaetano wrote:
>Conclusion
>----------
>
>There seem to be consensus for a WG to start, addressing at least the
>point of creating a Constituency for individuals.
>Other points raised are more controversial, and should be addressed by
>the Working Group.
Start a Working Group? To spend time on more useless, time-wasting,
non-productive administration issues? To be once again ignored by the Names
Council?
Create the individuals constituency and be done with it.
ICANN are calling for TLD applications - a function that the DNSO was
created to "specialize in" - and the DNSO have no role at all in that.
What's wrong with this picture?
Best Regards,
Simon
--
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|