ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] DNSO Review


At 05:40 PM 9/15/00 +0200, Roberto Gaetano wrote:

>Conclusion
>----------
>
>There seem to be consensus for a WG to start, addressing at least the
>point of creating a Constituency for individuals.
>Other points raised are more controversial, and should be addressed by
>the Working Group.

Start a Working Group? To spend time on more useless, time-wasting, 
non-productive administration issues? To be once again ignored by the Names 
Council?

Create the individuals constituency and be done with it.

ICANN are calling for TLD applications - a function that the DNSO was 
created to "specialize in" - and the DNSO have no role at all in that.

What's wrong with this picture?


Best Regards,

Simon

--
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html


  • References:

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>