Re: [ga] Re: [announce] Jonathan Cohen elected for 3 years term atthe ICANN Board

[James Love <love@cptech.org>]

The present structure is designed to give certain groups more power than
everyone else.  The groups that have less power are not too thrilled
with the outcome, which should not come as a big surprise.  Like many
others, I think the DNSO power structure is too stacked for big
corporate interests.  Some like it that way, and see this as a feature,
not a flaw.

  Jamie



On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, Roberto Gaetano wrote:

> Kent,
> 
> >
> >> >    2) the purpose of the DNSO is to give constituencies a voice
> >> 
> >> And what about those who do not belong to any constituency (like 
> myself,
> >>  for instance)? Should they be banned from the DNSO?
> >
> >You don't look like you are banned... :-)
> 
> Exactly.
> But I am not in any constituency: I don't qualify for any of them.
> This proves your statement 2) above incorrect.
> 
> >
> >> I think that the DNSO is to give a voice to all those who are 
> interested
> >>  in Domain Name issues. Those who are lucky enough to belong to a 
> >> recognized constituency can also have a *vote*, which is a different 
> 
> >> thing. Please let us have at least the voice, if not the vote. 
> >
> >You obviously have a voice -- this letter is proof of that.
> 
> And, again, this proves 2) incorrect.
> (of course, you can still argue that "the purpose of the DNSO is to give
>  constituencies a voice", and the fact that others also will have a 
> voice is an unplanned side effect - in that case, yes, you may be right)
> 
> 
> Regards
> Roberto
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> 

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html